Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:43
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Pro-AI Subreddit Bans 'Uptick' of Users Who Suffer from AI Delusions - 404 Media
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Blood test detects multiple cancer types through cell-free DNA - Medical Xpress
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Hedge funds seek to expand into private credit - Financial Times
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why did you put a guy’s dick in your mouth the first time?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
N.J. doctors are using a party drug to send patients to ‘another planet.’ Yes, it’s legal. - NJ.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why is my crush beautiful to me but not to others?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.